Log in
Building the Knowledge Base of Nonprofit Management:
A Searchable Database
Methodological issues in efficiency-focused program evaluation: the case of mental health.
Abstract
One of the major components of evaluation research involves the process of assigning relative value as a means for distinguishing good from bad programs. The cost-benefit framework provides one comprehensive means of discriminating among program alternatives through determining which uses resources in the most efficient manner. In more pragmatic terms, this approach to valuation can be seen as providing the means to address three equivalent evaluation questions: (1) Which alternative provides the most output for the least expenditure of resources? (2) Which alternative provides a given level of output for the least cost? (3) Which output provides the most output for a given level of input? This paper focuses on the methodological issues in implementing three activities that are unique to this approach to program evaluation. These are: (1) costs analysis, (2) benefits analysis, and (3) discounting of costs and benefits. Examples from the mental health field are used to explicate various means of dealing with the methodological challenges related to these activities. (This issue of Administration in Social Work contains 11 articles on efficiency and the social services.)
Journal
(1991)
vol15
no1-2
pages65-81
Categories
-
Evaluation and Information Management
-
Accountability and Efficiency
